This article by the Chicago Tribune
tells the story of the harsh realities of war and how those who put their lives
on the line are still feeling the impact of war even when they return home.
The
article does a wonderful job of acknowledging the mental illness issue
associated with suicide deaths. It doesn’t simply focus on the devastation of
suicide, but rather sheds light on the emotional and mental wounds that leave
soldiers hurting after the fact.
The
language and word-smithing in the article overall were impressive. Throughout
the whole article, the author used “killed themself” most often, and only
slipped up one time by using the terminology “committed suicide.”
While I
very much enjoyed the colorful and emotionally-strung narrative of this piece,
I couldn’t help but call into question some of the information they included
and they way they reported it. There is certainly a hint of bias that can be
detected in the beginning of the piece when the author called into question the
rationality behind sending young warriors into combat. I understand the purpose
in doing so – to illustrate the pain that comes from losing someone to war –
but it rubbed me the wrong way. But I digress.
The
author also included details as to how a solider who had returned home from war
killed himself. “He killed himself with a single gunshot.” A short and simple,
yet powerful statement. It’s not graphic or aggressive, but it certainly
implies that the one shot struck him somewhere on his body that was immediately
fatal and gory.
No comments:
Post a Comment